From practitioner reports to clinical evidence.

Current position

Program use and practitioner collaboration are established. Outcome validation is in progress, and formal trials are the next step for evidence statements that go beyond general psychoacoustic rationale.

Research roadmap

• Phase 0 — Complete: Practitioner development and iterative design with licensed therapists and meditation instructors.
• Phase 1 — In progress: Structured observation framework with standardized templates across practitioner network; aggregate context reporting on outcomes and adherence.
• Phase 2 — Planned: Feasibility study for Stress Regulation with HRV, perceived stress, and tolerability tracking.
• Phase 3 — Future: Controlled feasibility studies for Sleep Preparation and Guided Pacing across objective and subjective endpoints.
• Phase 4 — Future: Publication and open-data release with pre-registered protocols and replication-ready summaries.

What can be reported when available

• Population and listening context
• Program family and duration
• Adherence and completion statistics
• Pre/post self-report outcomes
• Tolerability, discomfort flags, discontinuation reasons
• Aggregate change summaries only

How we interpret outcomes

• Observational reporting is not equivalent to randomized evidence.
• Data should remain de-identified, aggregate, and context-specific.
• Claims must stay within the studied protocol and population.